diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md | 5 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md b/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md index b3b9d0c..dad2304 100644 --- a/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md +++ b/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md @@ -174,6 +174,11 @@ was or to understand who vetted the results. ## The Bottom Line +_If_ LinkedIn Intro works as built, and _if_ their security safeguards are put +into place, then Intro exposes its users to much greater risk of password +compromise and helps them expose themselves to surveillence, both government +and private. If either of those conditions does not hold, it's worse. + The software industry is young, and immature, and wealthy. There is no ethics body to complain to; had the developers of Intro said "no", they would very likely have been replaced by another round of developers who would help |