# A Users, Roles & Privileges Scheme Using Graphs The basic elements: * Every agent that can interact with a system is represented by a **user**. * Every capability the system has is authorized by a distinct **privilege**. * Each user has a list of zero or more **roles**. * Roles can **imply** further roles. This relationship is transitive: if role A implies role B, then a member of role A is a member of role B; if role B also implies role C, then a member of role A is also a member of role C. It helps if the resulting role graph is acyclic, but it's not necessary. * Roles can **grant** privileges. A user's privileges are the union of the privileges granted by the transitive closure of their roles. ## In SQL create table "user" ( username varchar primary key -- credentials &c ); create table role ( name varchar primary key ); create table role_member ( role varchar not null references role, member varchar not null references "user", primary key (role, member) ); create table role_implies ( role varchar not null references role, implied_role varchar not null ); create table privilege ( privilege varchar primary key ); create table role_grants ( role varchar not null references role, privilege varchar not null references privilege, primary key (role, privilege) ); If your database supports recursive CTEs, querying this isn't awful, since we can have the database do all the graph-walking along roles: with recursive user_roles (role) AS ( select role from role_member where member = 'SOME USERNAME' union select implied_role as role from user_roles join role_implies on user_roles.role = role_implies.role ) select distinct role_grants.privilege as privilege from user_roles join role_grants on user_roles.role = role_grants.role order by privilege; If not, get a better database. Recursive graph walking with network round trips at each step is stupid and you shouldn't do it. Realistic uses should have fairly simple graphs: elemental privileges are grouped into abstract roles, which are in turn grouped into meaningful roles (by department, for example), which are in turn granted to users. In PostgreSQL, the above schema handles ~10k privileges and ~10k roles with randomly-generated graph relationships in around 100ms on my laptop, which is pretty slow but not intolerable. Perverse cases (interconnected total subgraphs, deeply-nested linear graphs) can take absurd time but do not reflect any likely permissions scheme. ## What Sucks * Graph theory in my authorization system? It's more likely than you think. * There's no notion of revoking a privilege. If you have a privilege by any path through your roles, then it cannot be revoked except by removing all of the paths that lead back to that privilege. * Not every system has an efficient way to compute these graphs. * PostgreSQL, as given above, has a hard time with unrealistically-deep nested roles.