diff options
| author | ojacobson <ojacobson@noreply.codeberg.org> | 2025-05-30 21:13:28 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | ojacobson <ojacobson@noreply.codeberg.org> | 2025-05-30 21:13:28 +0200 |
| commit | 414de683b23d0c14a56934bc04f930301b369035 (patch) | |
| tree | 00c860d1f0fea005583c67330ae63dd6594f92da /package.json | |
| parent | 7a5c82d9b86e0a0828f4ccaac42b2db398945406 (diff) | |
| parent | 515cd2dbe6f202c92b938c4f7364c97b4eac9ab1 (diff) | |
Consolidate testing steps into `tools/test`.
I've opted to run with `--coverage` to ensure that we continue exercising coverage support. Hat tip to @wlonk for holding me accountable on this - I had thought coverage was broken, but I was holding it wrong.
Also adjusts the code coverage failure thresholds to match here-and-now reality. I'm not offering a policy thought here, just making sure we
1. use the coverage checking we have, and
2. set standards we are actually achieving.
This was originally part of [another proposal][pr-6]. I've broken it out to make the intent clearer, and to make the proposal easier to get a handle on in isolation from other, related changes. Thanks to @wlonk for their input on this!
[pr-6]: https://codeberg.org/ojacobson/pilcrow/pulls/6
Merges prop/test-tool into main.
Diffstat (limited to 'package.json')
| -rw-r--r-- | package.json | 4 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/package.json b/package.json index 85099e8..4501576 100644 --- a/package.json +++ b/package.json @@ -8,9 +8,7 @@ }, "scripts": { "lint": "prettier --check ui && eslint ui", - "format": "prettier --write ui", - "test": "vitest", - "coverage": "vitest run --coverage" + "format": "prettier --write ui" }, "devDependencies": { "@sveltejs/adapter-static": "^3.0.8", |