diff options
| author | ojacobson <ojacobson@noreply.codeberg.org> | 2025-05-30 21:13:28 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | ojacobson <ojacobson@noreply.codeberg.org> | 2025-05-30 21:13:28 +0200 |
| commit | 414de683b23d0c14a56934bc04f930301b369035 (patch) | |
| tree | 00c860d1f0fea005583c67330ae63dd6594f92da /vite.config.js | |
| parent | 7a5c82d9b86e0a0828f4ccaac42b2db398945406 (diff) | |
| parent | 515cd2dbe6f202c92b938c4f7364c97b4eac9ab1 (diff) | |
Consolidate testing steps into `tools/test`.
I've opted to run with `--coverage` to ensure that we continue exercising coverage support. Hat tip to @wlonk for holding me accountable on this - I had thought coverage was broken, but I was holding it wrong.
Also adjusts the code coverage failure thresholds to match here-and-now reality. I'm not offering a policy thought here, just making sure we
1. use the coverage checking we have, and
2. set standards we are actually achieving.
This was originally part of [another proposal][pr-6]. I've broken it out to make the intent clearer, and to make the proposal easier to get a handle on in isolation from other, related changes. Thanks to @wlonk for their input on this!
[pr-6]: https://codeberg.org/ojacobson/pilcrow/pulls/6
Merges prop/test-tool into main.
Diffstat (limited to 'vite.config.js')
| -rw-r--r-- | vite.config.js | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/vite.config.js b/vite.config.js index 4bd448f..fcf28aa 100644 --- a/vite.config.js +++ b/vite.config.js @@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ export default defineConfig({ restoreMocks: true, coverage: { thresholds: { - statements: 49, - branches: 60, - functions: 14, - lines: 49 + statements: 12, + branches: 85, + functions: 75, + lines: 12 }, exclude: [ ...configDefaults.exclude, |
