summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/migrations
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Assign sequence numbers from a counter, not by scanning messagesOwen Jacobson2024-09-28
|
* Send created events when channels are added.Owen Jacobson2024-09-28
|
* Use a vector of sequence numbers, not timestamps, to restart /api/events ↵Owen Jacobson2024-09-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | streams. The timestamp-based approach had some formal problems. In particular, it assumed that time always went forwards, which isn't necessarily the case: * Alice calls `/api/channels/Cfoo` to send a message. * The server assigns time T to the request. * The server stalls somewhere in send() for a while, before storing and broadcasting the message. If it helps, imagine blocking on `tx.begin().await?` for a while. * In this interval, Bob calls `/api/events?channel=Cfoo`, receives historical messages up to time U (after T), and disconnects. * The server resumes Alice's request and finishes it. * Bob reconnects, setting his Last-Event-Id header to timestamp U. In this scenario, Bob never sees Alice's message unless he starts over. It wasn't in the original stream, since it wasn't broadcast while Bob was subscribed, and it's not in the new stream, since Bob's resume point is after the timestamp on Alice's message. The new approach avoids this. Each message is assigned a _sequence number_ when it's stored. Bob can be sure that his stream included every event, since the resume point is identified by sequence number even if the server processes them out of chronological order: * Alice calls `/api/channels/Cfoo` to send a message. * The server assigns time T to the request. * The server stalls somewhere in send() for a while, before storing and broadcasting. * In this interval, Bob calls `/api/events?channel=Cfoo`, receives historical messages up to sequence Cfoo=N, and disconnects. * The server resumes Alice's request, assigns her message sequence M (after N), and finishes it. * Bob resumes his subscription at Cfoo=N. * Bob receives Alice's message at Cfoo=M. There's a natural mutual exclusion on sequence numbers, enforced by sqlite, which ensures that no two messages have the same sequence number. Since sqlite promises that transactions are serializable by default (and enforces this with a whole-DB write lock), we can be confident that sequence numbers are monotonic, as well. This scenario is, to put it mildly, contrived and unlikely - which is what motivated me to fix it. These kinds of bugs are fiendishly hard to identify, let alone reproduce or understand. I wonder how costly cloning a map is going to turn out to be… A note on database migrations: sqlite3 really, truly has no `alter table … alter column` statement. The only way to modify an existing column is to add the column to a new table. If `alter column` existed, I would create the new `sequence` column in `message` in a much less roundabout way. Fortunately, these migrations assume that they are being run _offline_, so operations like "replace the whole table" are reasonable.
* Transmit messages via `/:chan/send` and `/:chan/events`.Owen Jacobson2024-09-13
|
* Expire tokens based on when they were last used, not based on when they were ↵Owen Jacobson2024-09-11
| | | | | | | | issued. This lets us shorten the expiry interval - by quite a bit. Tokens in regular use will now live indefinitely, while tokens that go unused for _one week_ will be invalidated and deleted. This will reduce the number of "dead" tokens (still valid, but _de facto_ no longer in use) stored in the table, and limit the exposure period if a token is leaked and then not used immediately. It's also much less likely to produce surprise logouts three months after installation. You'll either stay logged in, or have to log in again much, much sooner, making it feel a lot more regular and less surprising.
* Remove the notion of "channel members."Owen Jacobson2024-09-11
| | | | | | This came out of a conversation with Kit. Their position, loosely, was that seeing scrollback when you look at a channel is useful, and since message delivery isn't meaningfully tied to membership (or at least doesn't have to be), what the hell is membership even doing? (I may have added that last part.) My take, on top of that, is that membership increases the amount of concepts we're committed to. We don't need that commitment yet.
* Allow any login to create channels.Owen Jacobson2024-09-04
|
* Index token (issued_at) to avoid table scans on expiryOwen Jacobson2024-09-04
|
* Allow login creation and authentication.Owen Jacobson2024-09-03
| | | | | | | | | | This is a beefy change, as it adds a TON of smaller pieces needed to make this all function: * A database migration. * A ton of new crates for things like password validation, timekeeping, and HTML generation. * A first cut at a module structure for routes, templates, repositories. * A family of ID types, for identifying various kinds of domain thing. * AppError, which _doesn't_ implement Error but can be sent to clients.
* Store state in sqlite. Default to .hi in the cwd.Owen Jacobson2024-08-30