| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
This'll catch style issues, mostly.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This API structure fell out of a conversation with Kit. Described loosely:
kit: ok
kit: Here's what I'm picturing in a client
kit: list channels, make-new-channel, zero to one active channels, post-to-active.
kit: login/sign-up, logout
owen: you will likely also want "am I logged in" here
kit: sure, whoami
|
| |
|
|
| |
This is implemented by making the return values, in most cases, idiosyncratic ad-hoc types that then convert to the approprate error response. This also should make endpoints more testable, since the return values can now be inspected to check their properties without having to process or parse an HTTP response.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is, again, groundwork for logic that requires more than just a database connection.
The login process has been changed to be more conventional, attempting login _before_ account creation rather than after it. This was not previously possible, because the data access methods used to perform these steps did not return enough information to carry out the workflow in that order. Separating storage from password validation and hashing forces the issue, and makes it clearer _at the App_ whether an account exists or not.
This does introduce the possibility of two racing inserts trying to lay claim to the same username. Transaction isolation should ensure that only one of them "wins," which is what you get before this change anyways.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a jumping-off point for adding logic that needs more than just the DB for state, such as chat message handling.
The name sucks, but it's the best I've got.
|
| |
|
|
| |
the value in that record used to verify logins.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1. Stop rejecting login attempts when there's an identity cookie already set.
This looked like a good idea, but in practice it's not a sufficient check, as it doesnt' ensure the identity cookie is actually valid. Validating it is an option, but the do-nothing alternative (which I went with) is that a login request while already logged in overwrites your identity cookie, instead. It's less code, semantically not bonkers, and doesn't _appear_ to introduce any interesting user security issues.
2. Redirect to / after successful login/logout, instead of dropping the user on a useless text page.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|
|
This is a beefy change, as it adds a TON of smaller pieces needed to make this all function:
* A database migration.
* A ton of new crates for things like password validation, timekeeping, and HTML generation.
* A first cut at a module structure for routes, templates, repositories.
* A family of ID types, for identifying various kinds of domain thing.
* AppError, which _doesn't_ implement Error but can be sent to clients.
|
