summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test/fixtures/boot.rs
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Make `Boot` a freestanding app type, rather than a view of ↵Owen Jacobson2025-10-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | `crate::app::App`'s internals. In the course of working on web push, I determined that we probably need to make `App` generic over the web push client we're using, so that tests can use a dummy client while the real app uses a client created at startup and maintained over the life of the program's execution. The most direct implementation of that is to render App as `App<P>`, where the parameter is occupied by the specific web push client type in use. However, doing this requires refactoring at _every_ site that mentions `App`, including every handler, even though the vast majority of those sites will not be concerned with web push. I reviewed a few options with @wlonk: * Accept the type parameter and apply it everywhere, as the cost of supporting web push. * Hard-code the use of a specific web push client. * Insulate handlers &c from `App` via provider traits, mimicing what we do for repository provider traits today. * Treat each app type as a freestanding state in its own right, so that only push-related components need to consider push clients (as far as is feasible). This is a prototype towards that last point, using a simple app component (boot) as a testbed. `FromRef` allows handlers that take a `Boot` to be used in routes that provide an `App`, so this is a contained change. However, the structure of `FromRef` prevents `Boot` from carrying any lifetime narrower than `'static`, so it now holds clones of the state fields it acquires from App, instead of references. This is fine - that's just a database pool, and sqlx's pool type is designed to be shared via cloning. From <https://docs.rs/sqlx/latest/sqlx/struct.Pool.html>: > Cloning Pool is cheap as it is simply a reference-counted handle to the inner pool state.
* Resume points are no longer optional.Owen Jacobson2024-10-30
This is an inconsequential change for actual clients, since "resume from the beginning" was never a preferred mode of operation, and it simplifies some internals. It should also mean we get better query plans where `coalesce(cond, true)` was previously being used.