| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
This is a **breaking change** for essentially all clients. Thankfully, there's presently just the one, so we don't need to go to much effort to accommoate that; the client is modified in this commit to adapt, users can reload their client, and life will go on.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
I've split this from the schema and API changes because, frankly, it's huge. Annoyingly so. There are no semantic changes in this, it's all symbol changes, but there are a _lot_ of them because the term "channel" leaks all over everything in a service whose primary role is managing messages sent to channels (now, conversations).
I found a buggy test while working on this! It's not fixed in this commit, because it felt mean to hide a real change in the middle of this much chaff.
|
|
|
These filters are meant to be used with, respectively, `Iterator::filter_map` and `StreamExt::filter_map`. The two operations are conceptually the same - they pass an item from the underlying sequence to a function that returns an option, drops the values for which the function returns `None`, and yields the value inside of `Some` in the resulting sequence.
However, `Iterator::filter_map` takes a function from the iterator elements to `Option<T>`. `StreamExt::filter_map` takes a function from the iterator elements to _a `Future` whose output is `Option<T>`_. As such, you can't easily use functions designed for one use case, for the other. You need an adapter - conventionally, `futures::ready`, if you have a non-async function and need an async one.
This provides two sets of sequence filters:
* `crate::test::fixtures::event` contains functions which return `Option` directly, and which are intended for use with `Iterator::filter_map`.
* `crate::test::fixtures::event::stream` contains lifted versions that return a `Future`, and which are intended for use with `StreamExt::filter_map`.
The lifting is done purely manually. I spent a lot of time writing clever-er versions before deciding on this; those were fun to write, but hell to read and not meaningfully better, and this is test support code, so we want it to be dumb and obvious. Complexity for the sake of intellectual satisfaction is a huge antifeature in this context.
|
