diff options
| author | Owen Jacobson <owen@grimoire.ca> | 2018-03-09 20:33:54 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Owen Jacobson <owen@grimoire.ca> | 2018-03-09 20:33:54 -0500 |
| commit | 57a0b91171ff5e93f13c2ba4bad485641b65ec3b (patch) | |
| tree | afccfc37903e17e65d0f70ca595f011f2023fad2 /wiki/chat/notes.md | |
| parent | 7725d5aa03d367d48de17e8c05819eb5179146a0 (diff) | |
Some notes towards a chat service
Diffstat (limited to 'wiki/chat/notes.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | wiki/chat/notes.md | 39 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/wiki/chat/notes.md b/wiki/chat/notes.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..84f60f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/wiki/chat/notes.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +# Notes towards a Chat Service + +Now: + +* Chat tools divide discussion by "channel"/"room" +* A channel is an undifferentiated sequence of remarks. +* Social dynamics in small channels: don't interrupt the current channel discussion even if you have another discussion to raise that would be within the channel's purpose. + * Conversations are bimodal: short bursts of generally-interesting remarks, or long chains of interrun responses. Not much middle ground. (Think meme channels vs discussion channels.) + * Small groups + robots: the robots interrupt things anyways, because they're robots. +* Social dynamics in large channels: it's moving too fast to really track, unless it's the _only_ thing you're doing. + +Slack specifically: + +* Per-social-circle UI modality makes it awkward to engage with multiple discussions at a time unless they all happen in the same place. +* Universally poor respect for consent. +* Pricing/business model issues: + +Instead: + +* A channel is a group of distinct discussions, plus a jumping-off point for new discussions. +* A user viewing a channel sees an overview of the ongoing discussions (maintained automatically or semi-automatically) along with lists of their active participants, and any initial remarks that could lead to a new discussion. +* A user can join an ongoing discussion and see the remarks to date, or duck out of it to see the summary again. +* A user can leave an ongoing discussion to indicate that they no longer expect to participate and may not respond to things said. +* Conversations "age out" of channels after they fall silent. +* Aged out conversations are still visible in archives and in the participants' clients, and necroposting brings them back. + +* New remarks to the channel appear as "prompts." +* Responding to a prompt creates a conversation. +* Prompts age out (quickly) if not responded to. + + + + + +Why: + +* Allow multiple concurrent discussions within the same nominal channel with minimal crosstalk/confusion. +* Insulate conversations from accidental interruptions, while making it easy to intentionally participate. +* Closer model to rooms full of people. |
