summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorOwen Jacobson <owen.jacobson@grimoire.ca>2013-10-29 21:05:34 -0400
committerOwen Jacobson <owen.jacobson@grimoire.ca>2013-10-29 21:05:34 -0400
commitf12d129becd0a54f2094611a0956128fe4b2fc83 (patch)
tree8753f818e2bdf7780fd451e77262d67a66e9a2d1 /wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md
parent86204c92eb7f1e32f799fb14748aba159721a0d8 (diff)
Not a footnote.
Diffstat (limited to 'wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md')
-rw-r--r--wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md b/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md
index 3944786..b3b9d0c 100644
--- a/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md
+++ b/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ outgoing mail server to deliver mail with correct SPF or DKIM validation. This
implies that LinkedIn Intro must know the user's email credentials, which it
acquires from their mobile device. Since this is a "use" of a password, not
merely a "validation" of an incoming password, the password must be available
-_to LinkedIn_ as plain text*. There are two serious problems with this that
+_to LinkedIn_ as plain text. There are two serious problems with this that
are directly LinkedIn's responsibilty, and a third that's indirect but
important. (Some email providers - notably Google - support non-password,
revokable authentication mechanisms for exactly this sort of use. It's not