Editorial pass & migration to mkdocs.

There's a lot in grimoire.ca that I either no longer stand behind or feel pretty weird about having out there.

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 67 deletions

diff --git a/wiki/gpg/cool.md b/wiki/gpg/cool.md
deleted file mode 100644
index ae5962c..0000000
--- a/wiki/gpg/cool.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,67 +0,0 @@
-# GPG Is Pretty Cool
-
-The GPG software suite is a pretty elegant cryptosystem. It provides:
-
-* A standard, well-maintained set of tools for creating and storing keys, and
-  associating them with identities
-
-* A suite of reliable tools for encrypting, signing, decrypting, and
-  verifying data that can be easily assembled into any combination of
-  integrity checks, authenticity checks, and privacy management
-
-* A key distribution network that does not rely on hierarchal authority and
-  that can be bootstrapped from scratch quickly and easily
-
-While GPG [sucks in a number of important ways](terrible), it's also the best
-tool we have right now for restoring privacy to private correspondance over
-the internet.
-
-## Code Signing
-
-Pretty much every Linux distribution relies on GPG for code signing. Rather
-than using GPG's web-of-trust model for key distribution, however, code
-signing with GPG usually creates a hierarchal PKI so that the root keys can
-be shipped with the operating system.
-
-This works shockingly well, and support for GPG is extremely well integrated
-into common package management systems such as apt and yum.
-
-## Source Control
-
-Which is basically code signing, admittedly, but even Git's support for GPG
-is basically great. Tools like Fossil embed it even deeper, and work quite
-well.
-
-## Email
-
-GPG's integration with email is surprisingly clever, follows a number of
-long-standing best practices for extending email, and does a _very_ good job
-of providing some guarantees that make sense in a not-terribly-long-ago view
-of email as a communications medium. In particular, if
-
-* who you talk to is not a secret, and
-* what, broadly, you are talking about is not a secret, but
-* the specifics of the discussion _are_ a secret, and
-* all participants are using GPG on their own mailers
-
-then GPG works brilliantly and modern GPG integration is very effective.
-
-These assumptions pretty accurately reflect the majority of email use up
-through the late 90s and early 2000s: technical or personal correspondence
-between known acquaintences.
-
-The internet has moved on from email for casual correspondence, but that
-doesn't invalidate the elegance of GPG's integration for GPG users.
-
-## Distributed Verification
-
-Even though GPG's trust model has some serious privacy costs and concerns, it
-works as a great proof of concept for CA-free identity management. That's
-huge: centralized CAs have even more onerous costs and worse risks than GPG's
-trust network, while offering less transparency to help offset those costs.
-
-Others have written some pretty interesting things on how to improve GPG's
-trust model and make it less succeptible to errors or key leaks by
-small-to-middling numbers of participants. [This
-post](https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2013-September/030235.html)
-to tor-talk last year is probably the most complete.