diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | .templates/base.html | 14 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | static/media/css/custom.css (renamed from static/media/css/comments.css) | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | wiki/cool-urls-can-change.md | 9 |
3 files changed, 21 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/.templates/base.html b/.templates/base.html index 39c5ae9..a6ecffd 100644 --- a/.templates/base.html +++ b/.templates/base.html @@ -1,5 +1,17 @@ {% extends 'markdoc-default/base.html' %} {% block css %} {{ super() }} -{{ html.cssimport(make_relative("/media/css/comments.css")) }} +{{ html.cssimport(make_relative("/media/css/custom.css")) }} {% endblock %} + +{% block body_footer %} +<div id="footer"> + <p> + {% if 'wiki-name' in config %} + {{ config['wiki-name']|e }} — + {% endif %} + Powered by <a href="http://markdoc.org/">Markdoc</a>. + <a href="https://github.com/ojacobson/grimoiredotca">See it on GitHub</a>. + </p> +</div> +{% endblock %}
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/static/media/css/comments.css b/static/media/css/custom.css index 39aa538..6159125 100644 --- a/static/media/css/comments.css +++ b/static/media/css/custom.css @@ -5,3 +5,6 @@ body #comments { overflow: hidden; padding: 15px 20px; width: 610px; } + +a[href^="https:"] { + text-decoration: underline; } diff --git a/wiki/cool-urls-can-change.md b/wiki/cool-urls-can-change.md index 2979b42..54795f9 100644 --- a/wiki/cool-urls-can-change.md +++ b/wiki/cool-urls-can-change.md @@ -19,10 +19,11 @@ The web is not, much, like print media. Something published may be amended; you don't even have to publish errata or a correction, since you can correct the original mistake "seamlessly". This has its good and its [bad](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_hole) parts, but with judicious use -and a public history, amendment is more of a win than a loss. However, this -plays havoc with the idea of a "publication" date, even for data that takes -the form of an article: is the publication date the date it was first made -public, the date of its most recent edit, or some other date? +and [a public history](https://github.com/ojacobson/grimoiredotca), amendment +is more of a win than a loss. However, this plays havoc with the idea of a +"publication" date, even for data that takes the form of an article: is the +publication date the date it was first made public, the date of its most +recent edit, or some other date? Because the name - the URL - of an article was set when I first published it, the date in the name had to be its initial publication date. _This has |