diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md | 9 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md b/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md index dad2304..1d55e38 100644 --- a/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md +++ b/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md @@ -174,10 +174,11 @@ was or to understand who vetted the results. ## The Bottom Line -_If_ LinkedIn Intro works as built, and _if_ their security safeguards are put -into place, then Intro exposes its users to much greater risk of password -compromise and helps them expose themselves to surveillence, both government -and private. If either of those conditions does not hold, it's worse. +_If_ LinkedIn Intro works as built, and _if_ their security safeguards are as +effective as they claim and hope, then Intro exposes its users to much greater +risk of password compromise and helps them expose themselves to surveillence, +both government and private. If either of those conditions does not hold, it's +worse. The software industry is young, and immature, and wealthy. There is no ethics body to complain to; had the developers of Intro said "no", they would very |