summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/wiki/mysql/broken-xa.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'wiki/mysql/broken-xa.md')
-rw-r--r--wiki/mysql/broken-xa.md6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/wiki/mysql/broken-xa.md b/wiki/mysql/broken-xa.md
index ff7fa75..19afe22 100644
--- a/wiki/mysql/broken-xa.md
+++ b/wiki/mysql/broken-xa.md
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ manual](http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/xa-restrictions.html):
If you're solving the kinds of problems where two-phase commit and XA
transaction management look attractive, then you very likely have the kinds of
-uptime requirements that make replication mandatory. "It works, but not with
-replication" is effectively "it doesn't work".
+uptime requirements that make replication mandatory. “It works, but not with
+replication” is effectively “it doesn't work.”
> It is possible that the server will roll back a pending XA transaction, even
> one that has reached the PREPARED state. This happens if a client connection
@@ -25,5 +25,5 @@ replication" is effectively "it doesn't work".
XA transaction managers assume that if every resource successfully reaches the
PREPARED state, then every resource will be able to commit the transaction
-"eventually". Resources that unilaterally roll back PREPARED transactions
+“eventually.” Resources that unilaterally roll back PREPARED transactions
violate this assumption pretty badly.