Add an endpoint for creating push subscriptions.

The semantics of this endpoint are somewhat complex, and are incompletely captured in the associated docs change. For posterity, the intended workflow is:

1. Obtain Pilcrow's current VAPID key by connecting (it's in the events, either from boot or from the event stream).
2. Use the browser push APIs to create a push subscription, using that VAPID key.
3. Send Pilcrow the push subscription endpoint and keys, plus the VAPID key the client used to create it so that the server can detect race conditions with key rotation.
4. Wait for messages to arrive.

This commit does not introduce any actual messages, just subscription management endpoints.

When the server's VAPID key is rotated, all existing subscriptions are discarded. Without the VAPID key, the server cannot service those subscriptions. We can't exactly notify the broker to stop processing messages on those subscriptions, so this is an incomplete solution to what to do if the key is being rotated due to a compromise, but it's better than nothing.

The shape of the API endpoint is heavily informed by the [JSON payload][web-push-json] provided by browser Web Push implementations, to ease client development in a browser-based context. The idea is that a client can take that JSON and send it to the server verbatim, without needing to transform it in any way, to submit the subscription to the server for use.

[web-push-json]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/PushSubscription/toJSON

Push subscriptions are operationally associated with a specific _user agent_, and have no inherent relationship with a Pilcrow login or token (session). Taken as-is, a subscription created by user A could be reused by user B if they share a user agent, even if user A logs out before user B logs in. Pilcrow therefore _logically_ associates push subscriptions with specific tokens, and abandons those subscriptions when the token is invalidated by

* logging out,
* expiry, or
* changing passwords.

(There are no other token invalidation workflows at this time.)

Stored subscriptions are also abandoned when the server's VAPID key changes.

1 files changed, 76 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/push/app.rs b/src/push/app.rs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..358a8cc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/push/app.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+use p256::ecdsa::VerifyingKey;
+use sqlx::SqlitePool;
+use web_push::SubscriptionInfo;
+
+use super::repo::Provider as _;
+use crate::{token::extract::Identity, vapid, vapid::repo::Provider as _};
+
+pub struct Push {
+    db: SqlitePool,
+}
+
+impl Push {
+    pub const fn new(db: SqlitePool) -> Self {
+        Self { db }
+    }
+
+    pub async fn subscribe(
+        &self,
+        subscriber: &Identity,
+        subscription: &SubscriptionInfo,
+        vapid: &VerifyingKey,
+    ) -> Result<(), SubscribeError> {
+        let mut tx = self.db.begin().await?;
+
+        let current = tx.vapid().current().await?;
+        if vapid != &current.key {
+            return Err(SubscribeError::StaleVapidKey(current.key));
+        }
+
+        match tx.push().create(&subscriber.token, subscription).await {
+            Ok(()) => (),
+            Err(err) => {
+                if let Some(err) = err.as_database_error()
+                    && err.is_unique_violation()
+                {
+                    let current = tx
+                        .push()
+                        .by_endpoint(&subscriber.login, &subscription.endpoint)
+                        .await?;
+                    // If we already have a subscription for this endpoint, with _different_
+                    // parameters, then this is a client error. They shouldn't reuse endpoint URLs,
+                    // per the various RFCs.
+                    //
+                    // However, if we have a subscription for this endpoint with the same parameters
+                    // then we accept it and silently do nothing. This may happen if, for example,
+                    // the subscribe request is retried due to a network interruption where it's
+                    // not clear whether the original request succeeded.
+                    if &current != subscription {
+                        return Err(SubscribeError::Duplicate);
+                    }
+                } else {
+                    return Err(SubscribeError::Database(err));
+                }
+            }
+        }
+
+        tx.commit().await?;
+
+        Ok(())
+    }
+}
+
+#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
+pub enum SubscribeError {
+    #[error(transparent)]
+    Database(#[from] sqlx::Error),
+    #[error(transparent)]
+    Vapid(#[from] vapid::repo::Error),
+    #[error("subscription created with stale VAPID key")]
+    StaleVapidKey(VerifyingKey),
+    #[error("subscription already exists for endpoint")]
+    // The endpoint URL is not included in the error, as it is a bearer credential in its own right
+    // and we want to limit its proliferation. The only intended recipient of this message is the
+    // client, which already knows the endpoint anyways and doesn't need us to tell them.
+    Duplicate,
+}