diff options
| author | Owen Jacobson <owen.jacobson@grimoire.ca> | 2013-10-29 21:57:48 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Owen Jacobson <owen.jacobson@grimoire.ca> | 2013-10-29 21:57:48 -0400 |
| commit | dc6a1dab123712a482990140083717f6c159bfbe (patch) | |
| tree | ec7926d059d3066f892df749cb70cbb545a4904c /wiki/ethics | |
| parent | 3fa693542e52eec866977ac9669c79af46b4ef83 (diff) | |
Clearer bottom line. For reals.
Diffstat (limited to 'wiki/ethics')
| -rw-r--r-- | wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md | 9 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md b/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md index dad2304..1d55e38 100644 --- a/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md +++ b/wiki/ethics/linkedin-intro.md @@ -174,10 +174,11 @@ was or to understand who vetted the results. ## The Bottom Line -_If_ LinkedIn Intro works as built, and _if_ their security safeguards are put -into place, then Intro exposes its users to much greater risk of password -compromise and helps them expose themselves to surveillence, both government -and private. If either of those conditions does not hold, it's worse. +_If_ LinkedIn Intro works as built, and _if_ their security safeguards are as +effective as they claim and hope, then Intro exposes its users to much greater +risk of password compromise and helps them expose themselves to surveillence, +both government and private. If either of those conditions does not hold, it's +worse. The software industry is young, and immature, and wealthy. There is no ethics body to complain to; had the developers of Intro said "no", they would very |